Reversing the Medicaid Squeeze

//Reversing the Medicaid Squeeze

Reversing the Medicaid Squeeze

The intricate maze of Medicaid Planning confuses even seasoned professionals if they don’t focus on this type of planning in their daily practice, and it’s easy to find differing opinions. Accountants cringe when told to liquidate an IRA because they’re used to minimizing taxes. Bankers gasp when told to liquidate or just transfer CDs to an irrevocable trust early because it means lost interest. And stock brokers hate, hate, hate taking money out of the market because they know, over time, the market outperforms almost all other investments. But what Medicaid Planners know is that all of those objections are now a far distant concern when matched against a Medicaid Game Plan because that plan is trying to save the family $120,000 or more a year on nursing home care.

As a Certified Medicaid Planner™ I get a lot of resistance from other financial and tax professionals precisely because they are not experienced or knowledgeable enough in Medicaid Planning to see the whole picture. Many bankers, accountants, and financial advisors are often rightly focused on their own specific profession, and the majority of their clients are not in crisis or going to be in the next few years. Let’s take a look at one problem area in Medicaid where I get the most resistance around a solution and then turn that into an advantage. Here’s an example of what is called “The Medicaid Squeeze.”

Adam and Betty are a couple, and Betty is in the very early stages of dementia. As part of a fully considered and vetted Medicaid Game Plan, we liquidate and move $500,000 of bank CDs from Adam and Betty into an irrevocable trust administered by their son Charles to start the five-year Medicaid clock. Once all of the assets in the Game Plan are moved and positioned, Betty could qualify for Medicaid five years and one month later. The plan is to keep $100,000 in a money market for liquidity and put the remaining $400,000 into an annuity guaranteed to never lose money. It’s always our strongest recommendation to not risk sheltered money in the market for the duration of the five-year lookback period.

Unfortunately, Charles talked to his broker who immediately convinced Charles to invest the whole $500,000 of his parent’s money in the market in some “cutting edge companies” because “we can make a lot more money in the market in this emerging industry.” Two things happen over the next year. First, the market crashes, leaving only $250,000 in the account. Second, Betty’s dementia worsens much sooner than expected and needs nursing home care as soon as possible.

Here’s where we get to the Medicaid Squeeze. The Medicaid Rule is that the gift or transfer is valued at fair market value at the time of the transfer. Medicaid only sees that $500,000 went into the trust, and they don’t care that after the transfer the money invested in stocks lost half it’s value. So if Betty needs nursing home care right away, it will have to be through private pay and the $250,000 probably won’t get her through the next four years. Even if the money market wasn’t making hardly anything and the annuity provided no gains that year, there would still be $500,000 we could draw from to provide care for Betty. By risking money to make money during this volatile five-year period, Adam and Betty’s son and his broker put them in an untenable position.

So how do we turn that Medicaid Squeeze rule into an advantage? It’s because the rule cuts both ways.

Let’s say that Adam and Betty also each had $2,000,000 death benefit life insurance policies with $100,000 of cash value in them. As part of the Game Plan we move both the cash from the liquidated CDs and the two life insurance policies into the trust, transferring ownership to the trust. Let’s also assume that Adam and Betty wanted their smarter son Danny to be the trustee. Instead of continuing to pay premiums on the life insurance policies, further draining away assets that his parents may need, Danny decides to sell the life insurance policies. After working with a broker to find the best deal, Danny finds the trust would net $400,000 for his mother’s policy and $250,000 for his father’s policy for a total of $650,000, or $550,000 more than if he just pulled out the cash value. Now instead of having the $600,000 total from the bank CDs and cash value pulled out of the life insurance, Danny has $1,150,000 in the trust to care for his parents. AND Danny would no longer be using precious cash to pay the premiums on these life insurance policies. If Betty’s dementia worsens dramatically one year into the Game Plan, then that added money is more than enough to cover Betty’s costs over the next four years to get past the five year lookback period.

Medicaid has rules, and they have to be followed. But Medicaid doesn’t get to pick and choose when to apply these rules. If Medicaid is going to value stocks going into the trust at fair market value at the time of transfer and not later when the market crashes, Medicaid also has to value the life insurance policies at cash value at the time they went into the trust and not for what they are sold after later. This simple technique of selling a life insurance policy after the transfer in the Medicaid Planning process can provide a significant advantage to seniors and their families.

For more information on planning for long term care, please see the website for The Care Assistance Center at www.CareAssistanceCenter.com or sign up for a free digital Care Assistance Information Packet at www.CareAssistanceCenter.com/CarePacket.

By | 2018-10-08T12:37:04+00:00 October 8th, 2018|Company News|0 Comments

About the Author: